Rosenberg v. City of New York
128 N.E.2d 802, 309 N.Y. 754, 1955 N.Y. LEXIS 1472
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rosenberg v. City of New York. Read the opinion of the Court — 309 N.Y. 304 →
Opinion
Reargument directed at the October, 1955, session of the Court of Appeals. If the order be reversed following reargument, and the delayed filing of petitioner-appellant Mollie Rosenberg’s controverted claim on November 16,1954, be thereby sanctioned, then for all purposes, including the purpose of any action commenced by said appellant against the City of New York within the time limited by law, the claim shall be deemed to have been duly filed on November 16, 1954. [See 308 N. Y. 965.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rosenberg v. City of New York, 128 N.E.2d 802, 309 N.Y. 754, 1955 N.Y. LEXIS 1472 (N.Y. 1955).
128 N.E.2d 802 (Rosenberg v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.