Rosenberg v. Circuit Judge
This text of 1 McGrath 96 (Rosenberg v. Circuit Judge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
To compel the dismissal of a case commenced by attachment, where both plaintiffs and defendants are non-residents of the State.
Denied April 16, 1895.
Certain property was attached in Clinton County, but relators [98]*98insist that when the debtor is a non-resident, the creditor must be a resident of the State.
Citing, Black on Judgments, Sec. 904; Moore vs. Circuit Judge, 55 M., 84 (620); Pennoyer vs. Neff, 95, U. S., 565; Freeman vs. Alderson, 119 U. S., 185; Towle vs. Wilder, 57 Vt., 622; Great Western Ry. Co. vs. Miller, 19 M., 305; Jacobson vs. Circuit Judge, 76 M., 234 (14). See No. 342.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 McGrath 96, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosenberg-v-circuit-judge-mich-1895.