Rosenberg v. Centre Davis Corp.
This text of 15 A.D.2d 506 (Rosenberg v. Centre Davis Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action by the vendee against the vendor under an executory contract for the sale of real property, to recover the vendee’s deposit and the cost of title examination and to impress a lien therefor on the property, in which the defendant asserted counterclaims for specific performance and damages, the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester 'County, entered October 20, 1960 upon the decision of the court after a nonjury trial, in favor of the plaintiff as prayed for in the complaint and dismissing defendant’s counterclaims. The trial court held that a restrictive covenant which, among other things, prohibited the construction or maintenance of any tenement house or dwelling house other than a one-family house, on a portion of the parcel to be conveyed, constituted an encumbrance which justified the rejection of title by plaintiff. Judgment affirmed, with costs (cf. Isaacs v. Schmuck, 245 N. Y. 77; Van Vliet & Place v. Gaines, 249 N. Y. 106; Mauser v. Friesco Beatty Corp., 230 App. Div. 790; Antin v. O’Shea, 270 App. Div. 1046; McAndrew v. Lanphear, 280 App. Div. 6; Wates v. Crandall, 144 N. Y. S. 2d 211, affd. 2 A D 2d 715). Nolan, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
15 A.D.2d 506, 222 N.Y.S.2d 391, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7469, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosenberg-v-centre-davis-corp-nyappdiv-1961.