Rosenberg v. Burgess

561 So. 2d 436, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3337, 1990 WL 64153
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 16, 1990
DocketNo. 90-0699
StatusPublished

This text of 561 So. 2d 436 (Rosenberg v. Burgess) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rosenberg v. Burgess, 561 So. 2d 436, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3337, 1990 WL 64153 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Here, as in Waste Management, Inc. v. Southern Bell, 544 So.2d 1133 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989), the trial court prematurely terminated its inquiry into petitioner’s work product objection, and departed from the essential requirements of law in determining that petitioner had no right to object to producing items which she herself had asked respondents to produce. Accordingly, we grant the petition for writ of certio-rari, quash the trial court’s February 12, 1990, and March 12, 1990, orders, and remand the case so the court can entertain petitioner’s work product objection on its merits.

DOWNEY, GUNTHER and STONE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Waste Management, Inc. v. SOUTHERN BELL TEL. AND TEL. CO.
544 So. 2d 1133 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
561 So. 2d 436, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3337, 1990 WL 64153, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosenberg-v-burgess-fladistctapp-1990.