Rosenberg v. Bridge
This text of 172 A.D.2d 1049 (Rosenberg v. Bridge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order insofar as appealed from unanimously reversed on the law without costs and motion denied. Memorandum: Plaintiff’s motion to compel disclosure, insofar as it sought the results and conclusions of an investigation conducted by defense counsel, should have been denied. Supreme Court’s order, which precluded defendant from offering the testimony of any of its employees concerning the results or conclusions of their investigation, went far beyond the relief sought by plaintiff. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, McGowan, J.—Discovery.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Denman, Pine and Law-ton, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
172 A.D.2d 1049, 571 N.Y.S.2d 406, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6311, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosenberg-v-bridge-nyappdiv-1991.