Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Rosenberg v. Bakerman

Rosenberg v. Bakerman

481 So. 2d 29, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2719, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 17240
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 10, 1985
DocketNo. 85-895
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 481 So. 2d 29 (Rosenberg v. Bakerman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rosenberg v. Bakerman, 481 So. 2d 29, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2719, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 17240 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Based upon appellees’ failure to name and serve the titleholder of the subject property in their mortgage foreclosure action, we reverse. Hubbard v. Highland Realty & Investment Co., 115 Fla. 834, 156 So. 322 (1934); Community Federal Savings & Loan Association v. Wright, 452 So.2d 638 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984); Davanzo v. Resolute Insurance Co., 346 So.2d 1227 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); Chapman v. L & N Grove, Inc., 265 So.2d 725 (Fla. 2d DCA 1972).

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chattel Ship. & Inv. v. Brickell Place Condo.
481 So. 2d 29 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
481 So. 2d 29, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2719, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 17240, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosenberg-v-bakerman-fladistctapp-1985.