Rosenberg

Court of Claims

Rosenberg

176 Ct. Cl. 1389, 1966 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 85, 1966 WL 1498

CourtUnited States Court of Claims

DecidedSeptember 30, 1966

DocketNo. 362-65

StatusPublished

This text of 176 Ct. Cl. 1389 (Rosenberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rosenberg, 176 Ct. Cl. 1389, 1966 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 85, 1966 WL 1498 (cc 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Civilian fay; dismissal. — Plaintiff, a veteran preference eligible employed as a mail handler at the New York City Post Office, sues to recover back pay on the ground that his dismissal for cause on December 5, 1961, was violative of section 14 of the Veterans’ Preference Act. The case came before the court on the parties’ motions for summary judgment. Upon consideration thereof and without oral argument, the court concluded that the dismissal was supported by substantial evidence and was not violative of plaintiff’s procedural rights, and that plaintiff’s claim that he was dismissed because of religious prejudice was unsupported and [1390]*1390expressly abandoned by plaintiff. On September 30, 1966, the court ordered that the petition be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Civilian fay; dismissal. — Plaintiff, a veteran preference eligible employed as a mail handler at the New York City Post Office, sues to recover back pay on the ground that his dismissal for cause on December 5, 1961, was violative of section 14 of the Veterans’ Preference Act. The case came before the court on the parties’ motions for summary judgment. Upon consideration thereof and without oral argument, the court concluded that the dismissal was supported by substantial evidence and was not violative of plaintiff’s procedural rights, and that plaintiff’s claim that he was dismissed because of religious prejudice was unsupported and [1390]*1390expressly abandoned by plaintiff. On September 30, 1966, the court ordered that the petition be dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

176 Ct. Cl. 1389, 1966 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 85, 1966 WL 1498, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosenberg-cc-1966.