Rosenbaum v. Small

Idaho Supreme Court

Rosenbaum v. Small

40 P. 54, 4 Idaho 423, 1895 Ida. LEXIS 33

DecidedApril 6, 1895

StatusPublished

This text of 40 P. 54 (Rosenbaum v. Small) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rosenbaum v. Small, 40 P. 54, 4 Idaho 423, 1895 Ida. LEXIS 33 (Idaho 1895).

Pincite

Opinion

HUSTON, J.

This is an appeal from the same judgment and like order overruling motion for a new trial as the two preceding cases against the same defendants. (Schiller v. Small, ante, p. 422, 40 Pac. 53; Peters v. Small, ante, p. 422, 40 Pac. 53.) The decree was entered June 27, 1893, and notice of appeal filed on June 29, 1894, and served on July 21, 1894. The appeal net having been taken within the time prescribed by statute, to wit, one year, this court has no jurisdiction to hear it.. Appeal dismissed, with costs to respondents.

Morgan, C. J., and Sullivan, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HUSTON, J.

This is an appeal from the same judgment and like order overruling motion for a new trial as the two preceding cases against the same defendants. (Schiller v. Small, ante, p. 422, 40 Pac. 53; Peters v. Small, ante, p. 422, 40 Pac. 53.) The decree was entered June 27, 1893, and notice of appeal filed on June 29, 1894, and served on July 21, 1894. The appeal net having been taken within the time prescribed by statute, to wit, one year, this court has no jurisdiction to hear it.. Appeal dismissed, with costs to respondents.

Morgan, C. J., and Sullivan, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

40 P. 54, 4 Idaho 423, 1895 Ida. LEXIS 33, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosenbaum-v-small-idaho-1895.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack