Rosenbaum v. Shoemaker
This text of 75 F.2d 1019 (Rosenbaum v. Shoemaker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case depends wholly on its individual facts. No precedent or new principle is involved. A study of the proofs shows the court below committed no error in directing the return, by the trustee in bankruptcy to their owners of the collateral securities in his hands. We accordingly limit ourselves to affirming the court’s order, the costs in this court and the court below to be paid by the bankrupt estate.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
75 F.2d 1019, 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 3172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosenbaum-v-shoemaker-ca3-1935.