Rosenbaum v. Schatia

248 A.D. 722

This text of 248 A.D. 722 (Rosenbaum v. Schatia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rosenbaum v. Schatia, 248 A.D. 722 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Opinion

Plaintiffs, claiming to have been coadventurers with defendant in the formation of a corporation and in the exploitation and commercialization of a certain device, sued to recover from defendant damages for his breach of the contract of eo adventure pursuant to which he was to have furnished to the corporation formed under said contract funds necessary for its financing from which were to be paid to plaintiffs certain salaries. Judgment entered on a verdict in favor of plaintiffs, after trial at Trial Term affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.; Martin, P. J., and Cohn, J., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
248 A.D. 722, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosenbaum-v-schatia-nyappdiv-1936.