Rosenbaum v. Rosenbaum
This text of 270 A.D.2d 242 (Rosenbaum v. Rosenbaum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Shapiro, J.), entered March 1, 1999, which, inter alia, granted a motion of the nonparty respondent, the Law Guardian for the parties’ children, to set her fee, and apportioned the fee between the parties.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
On the record presented, the Supreme Court’s determination and apportionment of the Law Guardian’s fee was not improper (see, Matter of Bungay v Morin, 256 AD2d 462; Petek v Petek, 239 AD2d 327; Richards v Richards, 189 AD2d 1025; Matter of Mouscardy v Mouscardy, 63 AD2d 973).
The plaintiffs remaining contentions are without merit. Ritter, J. P., Altman, Krausman and McGinity, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
270 A.D.2d 242, 704 N.Y.S.2d 839, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2511, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosenbaum-v-rosenbaum-nyappdiv-2000.