Rosenbaum v. Power

28 A.D.2d 662, 282 N.Y.S.2d 437, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3945
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 13, 1967·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Concur — Eager, Steuer and MeGivern, JJ.; Stevens, J. P., and McNally, J., dissent and vote to reverse in the following memorandum by McNally, J.: I dissent, and would hold the designation of Sharon Doyle Spring as a substitute candidate for female district leader to be invalid. The prior declination of Sharon Doyle Spring before the invalidation of her petition in respect of the same party position disqualifies her from being substituted. “ ‘ The Election Law plainly contemplates that the candidate designated to fill a vacancy shall be a person other than the person originally named.’ ” (Matter of Garfinkel v. Power, 208 Misc. 719, 720, affd. 286 App. Div. 957, affd. 309 N. Y. 779; Matter of Nestler v. Cohen, 242 App. Div. 726.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rosenbaum v. Power, 28 A.D.2d 662, 282 N.Y.S.2d 437, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3945 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1967).

28 A.D.2d 662 (Rosenbaum v. Power) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Wohl v. Bruen
2025 NY Slip Op 02861 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)