Rosenbaum v. Power

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rosenbaum v. Power

21 A.D.2d 700, 252 N.Y.S.2d 34, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3699

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 26, 1964

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 21 A.D.2d 700 (Rosenbaum v. Power) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rosenbaum v. Power, 21 A.D.2d 700, 252 N.Y.S.2d 34, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3699 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding under section 330 of the Election Law: (1) to invalidate a petition designating certain persons as candidates of the Democratic party in the primary election to be held June 2, 1964 for certain public offices and party positions in the First Assembly District, Kings County; and (2) for other related relief, in which all objections other than the objection to the respondent Max M. Turshen’s candidacy for the office of Member of the Assembly from said district were withdrawn, the petitioners appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered May 21, 1964 after a hearing, which dismissed the petition. Judgment affirmed, without costs. We find no deception, fraud or confusion in this case. Motion by appellants for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding under section 330 of the Election Law: (1) to invalidate a petition designating certain persons as candidates of the Democratic party in the primary election to be held June 2, 1964 for certain public offices and party positions in the First Assembly District, Kings County; and (2) for other related relief, in which all objections other than the objection to the respondent Max M. Turshen’s candidacy for the office of Member of the Assembly from said district were withdrawn, the petitioners appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered May 21, 1964 after a hearing, which dismissed the petition. Judgment affirmed, without costs. We find no deception, fraud or confusion in this case. Motion by appellants for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 A.D.2d 700, 252 N.Y.S.2d 34, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3699, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosenbaum-v-power-nyappdiv-1964.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack