Rosenbaum v. Lefrak Corp.
This text of 429 N.E.2d 828 (Rosenbaum v. Lefrak Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal taken by plaintiffs Samuel and Esther Rosenbaum dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals sua sponte, upon the ground that the stipulation filed by plaintiffs is not a stipulation for judgment absolute within the meaning of CPLR 5601 (subd [c]) (see Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals, § 62, pp 279-280).
Appeals taken by defendant Zwicker and third-party defendant Zaretsky dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals sua sponte, upon the ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution (Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals, § 14).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
429 N.E.2d 828, 54 N.Y.2d 904, 445 N.Y.S.2d 149, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 3104, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosenbaum-v-lefrak-corp-ny-1981.