Rosen v. State

644 So. 2d 531, 1994 WL 498404
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 14, 1994·No. 93-2688, 93-2738·Published

Opinion

644 So.2d 531 (1994)

Neil Darren ROSEN, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 93-2688, 93-2738.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

September 14, 1994.

*532 Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Louis G. Carres, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, Michael J. Neimand, Asst. Atty. Gen., Miami, Parker D. Thomson and Carol A. Licko, Sp. Asst. Attys. Gen., Miami, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Neil Rosen, was convicted of aggravated stalking pursuant to section 784.048, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1992), Florida's Stalking Statute. Rosen filed a motion to dismiss on the grounds that the stalking statute is facially unconstitutional. We affirm the trial court's denial of the motion to dismiss on the authority of State v. Kahles, 644 So.2d 512 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994).

DELL, C.J., and GUNTHER and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rosen v. State, 644 So. 2d 531, 1994 WL 498404 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

644 So. 2d 531 (Rosen v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Kahles
644 So. 2d 512 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)