Rosen v. State
This text of 644 So. 2d 531 (Rosen v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Neil Darren ROSEN, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
*532 Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Louis G. Carres, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, Michael J. Neimand, Asst. Atty. Gen., Miami, Parker D. Thomson and Carol A. Licko, Sp. Asst. Attys. Gen., Miami, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Neil Rosen, was convicted of aggravated stalking pursuant to section 784.048, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1992), Florida's Stalking Statute. Rosen filed a motion to dismiss on the grounds that the stalking statute is facially unconstitutional. We affirm the trial court's denial of the motion to dismiss on the authority of State v. Kahles, 644 So.2d 512 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994).
DELL, C.J., and GUNTHER and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
644 So. 2d 531, 1994 WL 498404, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosen-v-state-fladistctapp-1994.