Rosen v. Schwartz

2017 NY Slip Op 2517, 148 A.D.3d 653, 49 N.Y.S.3d 301
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 30, 2017·No. 3578 157124/15·Published

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Geoffrey D. Wright, J.), entered February 29, 2016, which granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the complaint reinstated.

Although defendant was found not guilty by reason of mental *654 disease or defect in connection with the stabbing death of his mother, the complaint stated a viable wrongful death claim against him pursuant to EPTL 5-4.1, since an insane person may be liable in tort for his actions (see Hirsch v Mastroianni, 80 AD2d 633, 634 [2d Dept 1981]; Albicocco v Nicoletto, 11 AD2d 690 [2d Dept 1960], affd 9 NY2d 920 [1961]). A wrongful death claim was also stated on behalf of defendant’s brother, who committed suicide after his mother’s murder. To the extent Supreme Court decided whether defendant may inherit from his mother’s estate, no ruling on that question was sought by plaintiffs, and, in any event, the ruling was not only premature, but should be determined in the Surrogate’s Court (see e.g. Matter of Demesyeux, 42 Misc 3d 730 [Sur Ct, Nassau County 2013]).

Concur — Tom, J.P., Moskowitz, Feinman, Gische and Kapnick, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rosen v. Schwartz, 2017 NY Slip Op 2517, 148 A.D.3d 653, 49 N.Y.S.3d 301 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

2017 NY Slip Op 2517 (Rosen v. Schwartz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Albicocco v. Nicoletto
176 N.E.2d 100 (New York Court of Appeals, 1961)
Hirsch v. Mastroianni
80 A.D.2d 633 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
In re Demesyeux
42 Misc. 3d 730 (New York Surrogate's Court, 2013)