Rosen v. NEW YORK CITY TEACHERS'RET. BD.
116 N.E.2d 239, 306 N.Y. 625
This text of 116 N.E.2d 239 (Rosen v. NEW YORK CITY TEACHERS'RET. BD.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rosen v. NEW YORK CITY TEACHERS'RET. BD., 116 N.E.2d 239, 306 N.Y. 625 (N.Y. 1953).
Opinion
May S. Rosen, Appellant,
v.
New York City Teachers' Retirement Board et al., Respondents.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Benjamin M. Zelman for appellant.
Denis M. Hurley, Corporation Counsel (Helen R. Cassidy, Seymour B. Quel, Edward J. McLaughlin and Blossom Graubard of counsel), for respondents.
Concur: LEWIS, Ch. J., CONWAY, DESMOND, DYE, FULD, FROESSEL and VAN VOORHIS, JJ.
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Rosen v. New York City Teachers' Retirement Board
116 N.E.2d 239 (New York Court of Appeals, 1953)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
116 N.E.2d 239, 306 N.Y. 625, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosen-v-new-york-city-teachersret-bd-ny-1953.