Rosen v. Karp
This text of 187 Misc. 453 (Rosen v. Karp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Memorandum The record here shows that the
Trial Justice predicated his decision upon the landlord’s failure to establish an “ immediate compelling necessity ” for the apartment presently occupied by the tenant. This was error, for such necessity does not apply to cases where the rent director has issued a certificate under paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) of section 6 of the Rent Regulation for Housing in the New [454]*454York City Defense-Rental Area (8 Federal Register 13918, aa amd.), as in the instant case. The only question for decision, therefore, was whether or not the certificate was being used by the landlord in good faith.
The final order should be unanimously reversed upon the law and new trial granted, with $30 costs to landlord to abide the event.
MacCeate, Smith and Steinbeink, JJ., concur.
Order reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
187 Misc. 453, 67 N.Y.S.2d 289, 1946 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3229, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosen-v-karp-nyappterm-1946.