Rosen v. Hults

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rosen v. Hults

13 A.D.2d 813, 218 N.Y.S.2d 463, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10798

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 18, 1961

StatusPublished

This text of 13 A.D.2d 813 (Rosen v. Hults) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rosen v. Hults, 13 A.D.2d 813, 218 N.Y.S.2d 463, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10798 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion by petitioner for leave to prosecute the proceeding on the original papers and to add proceeding to the June Term Calendar, granted. The proceeding will be heard on the original papers and on six copies of petitioner’s typewritten brief, which shall include a copy of the opinion, if any, rendered by respondent in revoking the license. The proceeding is ordered on the calendar for Friday, June 2, 1961. Petitioner’s brief shall be served and filed on or before May 29, 1961. Motion by petitioner for a stay of the license revocation, pending determination of proceeding, denied. Beldoek, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion by petitioner for leave to prosecute the proceeding on the original papers and to add proceeding to the June Term Calendar, granted. The proceeding will be heard on the original papers and on six copies of petitioner’s typewritten brief, which shall include a copy of the opinion, if any, rendered by respondent in revoking the license. The proceeding is ordered on the calendar for Friday, June 2, 1961. Petitioner’s brief shall be served and filed on or before May 29, 1961. Motion by petitioner for a stay of the license revocation, pending determination of proceeding, denied. Beldoek, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 A.D.2d 813, 218 N.Y.S.2d 463, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10798, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosen-v-hults-nyappdiv-1961.