Rosen v. Goldstein

234 A.D. 872

This text of 234 A.D. 872 (Rosen v. Goldstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rosen v. Goldstein, 234 A.D. 872 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

Opinion

Orders denying motions to dismiss the second cause of action on the ground of insufficiency and granting motions to strike out said cause of action on the ground of improper joinder modified by striking therefrom the provision for service of amended complaints, and as so modified affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to plaintiff, with leave to defendants to answer within ten days from service of a copy of the order herein. The orders appealed from substantially severed the tort from the equity action. Severance of the actions under section 96 of the Civil Practice Act made it unnecessary to serve a second summons or amended complaints. The parties to the tort action may proceed to trial under the first cause of action. If plaintiff is successful therein, the parties to the equity action may proceed to trial upon the second cause of action. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Scudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
234 A.D. 872, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosen-v-goldstein-nyappdiv-1931.