Rosen v. City of Paterson

186 A. 584, 14 N.J. Misc. 655, 1936 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 286
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided August 12, 1936·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

This is an application for a writ of certiorari to “review the amount of taxes levied and billed against” prosecutors, covering certain property in the city of Paterson. The contention of the prosecutors is that there should be an exemption from taxation to the extent of six-sixteenths of the value of the property, by reason of ownership to that extent in the Society for Useful Manufactures, a tax exempt corporation.

This is an attempt to review the assessment directly by certiorari without first taking an appeal to the county board of taxation and the state board of tax appeals. We are of the opinion that the statutory method of review should be followed before the allowance of the discretionary writ of this court. Hackensack Water Co. v. State Board, 104 N. J. L. 48; 139 Atl. Rep. 410.

The writ is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rosen v. City of Paterson, 186 A. 584, 14 N.J. Misc. 655, 1936 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 286 (N.J. 1936).

186 A. 584 (Rosen v. City of Paterson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Consolidated Cigar Corp. v. Brunner
42 A.2d 631 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1945)
Mattix v. Maurice River Township
191 A. 464 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1937)