Rosen v. Circuit Judge

1 McGrath 96
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 10, 1895
DocketNo. 14936
StatusPublished

This text of 1 McGrath 96 (Rosen v. Circuit Judge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rosen v. Circuit Judge, 1 McGrath 96 (Mich. 1895).

Opinion

To set aside a judgment and quash the writ of attachment by which the proceedings were instituted. ' '

Denied October 10, 1895, with costs.

In February, 1894, the writ was issued out of the Wayne Circuit Court upon an affidavit setting forth that plaintiffs were residents of Chicago, Ill.; that the defendant (relator here) was a resident of Eaton County, Mich.; that defendant had no property in Eaton County and that there is no property of defendant subject to attachment within the County of Wayne.

Defendant was not served and did not appear.

Publication was had, defendant’s default entered and judgment entered in July, 1894.

In April, 1895, defendant moved to set aside the judgment and quash the wilt. (1), because plaintiffs were non-residents of the State of Michigan and defendant resided in Eaton County; and (2) because no affidavit of the commencement of publication was filed as required by Act No. 8, Laws of 1891.

The circuit judge permitted the affidavit to be filed nunc pro tune and denied the motion to quash. Kespondent cited Stringer vs. Dean, 61 M., 196.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 McGrath 96, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosen-v-circuit-judge-mich-1895.