Rosen, M.D. Vs. Amster

470 P.3d 213
Nevada Supreme Court·Decided August 27, 2020·No. 81487·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

MARK ROSEN, M.D., INDIVIDUALLY; No. 81487 AND MARK J. ROSEN, M.D., A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION, A DOMESTIC PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION, FILED Appellants, vs. AUG 2 7 2020 GAIL AMSTER, INDIVIDUALLY, ELIZABETH A. BROWN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT

Res ondent. BY S. VIS-4 DEPUTY CLERK 6

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, this appeal is dismissed. The parties shall bear their own costs and attorney fees. NRAP 42(b).

It is so ORDERED.

, C.J.

cc: Hon. David M. Jones, District Judge Stephen E. Haberfeld, Settlement Judge Marquis Aurbach Coffing Mainor Wirth Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) I947A

3 9

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rosen, M.D. Vs. Amster, 470 P.3d 213 (Neb. 2020).

470 P.3d 213 (Rosen, M.D. Vs. Amster) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.