Rosen, M.D. Vs. Amster
This text of 470 P.3d 213 (Rosen, M.D. Vs. Amster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
MARK ROSEN, M.D., INDIVIDUALLY; No. 81487 AND MARK J. ROSEN, M.D., A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION, A DOMESTIC PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION, FILED Appellants, vs. AUG 2 7 2020 GAIL AMSTER, INDIVIDUALLY, ELIZABETH A. BROWN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT Res ondent. BY S. VIS-4 DEPUTY CLERK 6
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, this appeal is dismissed. The parties shall bear their own costs and attorney fees. NRAP 42(b). It is so ORDERED.
, C.J.
cc: Hon. David M. Jones, District Judge Stephen E. Haberfeld, Settlement Judge Marquis Aurbach Coffing Mainor Wirth Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) I947A
3 9
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
470 P.3d 213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosen-md-vs-amster-nev-2020.