Rosen, Et Vir. v. City of Miami

193 So. 749, 141 Fla. 664
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJanuary 30, 1940
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 193 So. 749 (Rosen, Et Vir. v. City of Miami) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rosen, Et Vir. v. City of Miami, 193 So. 749, 141 Fla. 664 (Fla. 1940).

Opinion

Terrell, C. J.

This writ of error is to a final judgment on demurrer to a declaration seeking to recover damages for personal injuries to the plaintiff in error, received in an automobile collision at the intersection of Southwest 16th Avenue with Southwest Eleventh Street in the City of Miami. It is contended that the negligence of the City consisted in removing a stop sign from Southwest Eleventh Street which had been there for some time and was required by the ordinances of the city as a safety device.

The mere fact that stop signs are placed at street intersections does not remove the responsibility of motorists to drive with due care for their safety. It is shown that both cars entered the intersection at the same time in full view of the occupants in each and that the collision could have *665 been avoided if either had slowed up and given the other the right of way. Motorists driving headlong into each other in this manner are guilty of negligence and cannot hold the City liable for damages incurred. Stop signs are nothing more than cautionary devices they do not relieve the responsibility to drive with care.

Finding no reason to reverse the judgment below it is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Buford and Thomas, J. J., concur. Chapman, J., concurs in opinion and judgment. Justices Whitfield and Brown not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Food Fair v. Gold
464 So. 2d 1228 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Galivan v. Lowell Dunn Co.
212 So. 2d 334 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)
Martinez ex rel. Martinez v. Tri-City Electric Co.
175 So. 2d 94 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1965)
Foley v. Hialeah Race Course
53 So. 2d 771 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1951)
City of Tampa v. Finley
11 So. 2d 576 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1943)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
193 So. 749, 141 Fla. 664, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosen-et-vir-v-city-of-miami-fla-1940.