Rosemurgy v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.

673 So. 2d 989, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5513, 1996 WL 280023
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 29, 1996·No. No. 95-1913·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals a trial court order dismissing his amended complaint and directing the parties to appraisal pursuant to an appraisal provision in State Farm’s insurance policy. We affirm and align ourselves with the reasoning expressed by the first district in Scottsdale Insurance Co. v. Desalvo, 666 So.2d 944 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). Accordingly, we certify conflict with State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. v. Liceo, 649 So.2d 910 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. granted, 662 So.2d 933 (Fla.1995), Gables Court Professional Centre, Inc. v. Merrimack Mutual Fire Insurance Co., 642 So.2d 74 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. dismissed, 650 So.2d 990 (Fla.1994), Robles v. Harco National Insurance Co., 669 So.2d 1049 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995), rev. granted, 667 So.2d 774 (Fla. 1996), and American Reliance Insurance Co. v. Village Homes at Country Walk, 632 So.2d 106 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 640 So.2d 1106 (Fla.1994).

AFFIRMED.

GUNTHER, C.J., and WARNER and FARMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rosemurgy v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., 673 So. 2d 989, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5513, 1996 WL 280023 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

673 So. 2d 989 (Rosemurgy v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rosemurgy v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.
685 So. 2d 1289 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1996)
Paradise Plaza Condominium Ass'n v. Reinsurance Corp. of New York
685 So. 2d 937 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
PARADISE PLAZA v. Reinsurance Corp.
685 So. 2d 937 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)