Rosemund v. Rosemund

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Rosemund v. Rosemund

197 A.2d 841, 234 Md. 55, 1964 Md. LEXIS 585

CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland

DecidedMarch 5, 1964

DocketNo. 208

StatusPublished

This text of 197 A.2d 841 (Rosemund v. Rosemund) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rosemund v. Rosemund, 197 A.2d 841, 234 Md. 55, 1964 Md. LEXIS 585 (Md. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

After the trial below, the Chancellor dismissed appellant’s bill of complaint, which prayed an absolute divorce on the ground of desertion, for lack of any corroboration of plaintiff’s testimony. It would subserve no good purpose to set forth the evidence adduced, for after a careful consideration thereof, we, too, are unable to discover any corroboration of plaintiff’s accusations, which is an essential ingredient, in Maryland, of the proof required to obtain a divorce.

Decree affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

After the trial below, the Chancellor dismissed appellant’s bill of complaint, which prayed an absolute divorce on the ground of desertion, for lack of any corroboration of plaintiff’s testimony. It would subserve no good purpose to set forth the evidence adduced, for after a careful consideration thereof, we, too, are unable to discover any corroboration of plaintiff’s accusations, which is an essential ingredient, in Maryland, of the proof required to obtain a divorce.

Decree affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

197 A.2d 841, 234 Md. 55, 1964 Md. LEXIS 585, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosemund-v-rosemund-md-1964.