Rosemont Berkeley Lake v. Nyasha Fisher

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
• Decided: July 24, 2025
• Docket: 25-11852
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

USCA11 Case: 25-11852 Document: 9-1 Date Filed: 07/24/2025 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 25-11852 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________

ROSEMONT BERKELEY LAKE, Eos Real Estate Management, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus NYASHA FISHER, and All Other Occupants,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia USCA11 Case: 25-11852 Document: 9-1 Date Filed: 07/24/2025 Page: 2 of 2

2 Opinion of the Court 25-11852

D.C. Docket No. 1:25-cv-01096-JPB ____________________

Before BRANCH, GRANT, and BRASHER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdic- tion. Nyasha Fisher, pro se, appeals from the district court’s May 27, 2025, order remanding the case to Georgia state court. Because the order remanded the case for lack of federal subject matter ju- risdiction, it is unreviewable on appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c)-(d); New v. Sports & Recreation, Inc., 114 F.3d 1092, 1095-96 (11th Cir. 1997) (concluding that a remand order based on lack of subject matter jurisdiction is unreviewable even when “clearly errone- ous”); Kircher v. Putnam Funds Tr., 547 U.S. 633, 641-42 (2006) (noting that a remand order pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c) is unreviewable “no matter how plain the legal error in ordering the remand”). Fur- ther, the notice of removal did not cite 28 U.S.C. §§ 1442 or 1443 as a basis for removal.