Rosemond v. DeSoto Land & Cattle Co.

452 So. 2d 122, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13479
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 8, 1984·No. No. AU-53·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

MILLS, Judge.

The deputy commissioner correctly denied Rosemond’s claim for workers’ compensation benefits. There was competent substantial evidence to support the finding that there was not an employer/employee relationship between Rosemond and DeSo-to Land & Cattle Company.

AFFIRMED.

SHIVERS and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rosemond v. DeSoto Land & Cattle Co., 452 So. 2d 122, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13479 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

452 So. 2d 122 (Rosemond v. DeSoto Land & Cattle Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brown v. State
452 So. 2d 122 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)