Rosemond v. DeSoto Land & Cattle Co.

452 So. 2d 122, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13479
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 8, 1984
DocketNo. AU-53
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 452 So. 2d 122 (Rosemond v. DeSoto Land & Cattle Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rosemond v. DeSoto Land & Cattle Co., 452 So. 2d 122, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13479 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

MILLS, Judge.

The deputy commissioner correctly denied Rosemond’s claim for workers’ compensation benefits. There was competent substantial evidence to support the finding that there was not an employer/employee relationship between Rosemond and DeSo-to Land & Cattle Company.

AFFIRMED.

SHIVERS and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brown v. State
452 So. 2d 122 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
452 So. 2d 122, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13479, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosemond-v-desoto-land-cattle-co-fladistctapp-1984.