Rosemond v. Bruck

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: August 26, 2002
• Docket: 02-7008
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7008

ANDRE KEVIN ROSEMOND,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DAVID BRUCK; ROBERT LOMINACK; DONALD MORGAN; LAWRENCE CANTEY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (CA-01-4332-0-23-BD)

Submitted: August 15, 2002 Decided: August 26, 2002

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Andre Kevin Rosemond, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Andre Kevin Rosemond appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001)

complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. See Rosemond v. Bruck, No. CA-01-4332-0-23-BD

(D.S.C. June 11, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED