Rosemiller v. Biswanger

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Rosemiller v. Biswanger

182 A. 383, 320 Pa. 259, 1936 Pa. LEXIS 584

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedDecember 5, 1935

DocketAppeals, 327 and 328

StatusPublished

This text of 182 A. 383 (Rosemiller v. Biswanger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rosemiller v. Biswanger, 182 A. 383, 320 Pa. 259, 1936 Pa. LEXIS 584 (Pa. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Upon the trial of this action of trespass to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the minor plaintiff, the jury returned a verdict in favor of defendant. The testimony developed a clear question of fact as to defendant’s negligence which was submitted to the jury in a charge which we find to be free from reversible error. A careful examination of the record discloses no ground for disturbing the verdict.

The judgment and order of the court below, refusing plaintiff’s motion for a new trial, is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

Upon the trial of this action of trespass to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the minor plaintiff, the jury returned a verdict in favor of defendant. The testimony developed a clear question of fact as to defendant’s negligence which was submitted to the jury in a charge which we find to be free from reversible error. A careful examination of the record discloses no ground for disturbing the verdict.

The judgment and order of the court below, refusing plaintiff’s motion for a new trial, is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

182 A. 383, 320 Pa. 259, 1936 Pa. LEXIS 584, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosemiller-v-biswanger-pa-1935.