Rosemary Shiflet v. Bertha Lou Daisy, Administratrix of the Estate of Albert Daisy, Deceased

Fifth Circuit

Rosemary Shiflet v. Bertha Lou Daisy, Administratrix of the Estate of Albert Daisy, Deceased

373 F.2d 522

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 21, 1967

Docket23829_1

StatusPublished

This text of 373 F.2d 522 (Rosemary Shiflet v. Bertha Lou Daisy, Administratrix of the Estate of Albert Daisy, Deceased) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rosemary Shiflet v. Bertha Lou Daisy, Administratrix of the Estate of Albert Daisy, Deceased, 373 F.2d 522 (5th Cir. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court awarding damages to the libellant for the death of her husband in an action brought against a shipowner under the provisions of the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C. § 688. The deceased, master of a deepsea trawler owned by appellant, met his death when the trawler ran aground and broke up off the coast of Soto La Marina, Mexico, during a storm in December, 1964. The trial court, sitting without a jury, entered findings of fact and conclusions of law to the effect that the life raft aboard the vessel was unseaworthy, that such condition was within the privity and knowledge of appellant, that the unseaworthiness of the life raft was a proximate cause of the master’s death, and that the master had not been contributorily negligent. 1 Judgment was accordingly entered in the amount of $40,000.

On this appeal, the shipowner vigorously challenges the findings of negligence, causation, and the award of damages. Convinced as we are, however, after careful scrutiny of the entire record, that the findings and conclusions of the trial court on these issues cannot be viewed as clearly erroneous, McAllister v. United States, 1954, 348 U.S. 19, 20, 75 S.Ct. 6, 8, 99 L.Ed. 20, 24, we therefore

Affirm.

1

. Record, pp. 291-98.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court awarding damages to the libellant for the death of her husband in an action brought against a shipowner under the provisions of the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C. § 688. The deceased, master of a deepsea trawler owned by appellant, met his death when the trawler ran aground and broke up off the coast of Soto La Marina, Mexico, during a storm in December, 1964. The trial court, sitting without a jury, entered findings of fact and conclusions of law to the effect that the life raft aboard the vessel was unseaworthy, that such condition was within the privity and knowledge of appellant, that the unseaworthiness of the life raft was a proximate cause of the master’s death, and that the master had not been contributorily negligent. 1 Judgment was accordingly entered in the amount of $40,000.

On this appeal, the shipowner vigorously challenges the findings of negligence, causation, and the award of damages. Convinced as we are, however, after careful scrutiny of the entire record, that the findings and conclusions of the trial court on these issues cannot be viewed as clearly erroneous, McAllister v. United States, 1954, 348 U.S. 19, 20, 75 S.Ct. 6, 8, 99 L.Ed. 20, 24, we therefore

Affirm.

1

. Record, pp. 291-98.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

373 F.2d 522, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosemary-shiflet-v-bertha-lou-daisy-administratrix-of-the-estate-of-ca5-1967.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack