Rosemaria Reyes De Nava and Sergio Nada Hernandez, Parents of and as the Representatives of the Estate of Mauricio Rigoberto Nava, (APPELLANTS/CROSS-APPELLEES) v. Flash Trucking, Inc, Dora A. Alanis and Fernando Corona Barbosa, (APPELLEES/CROSS-APPELLANTS) Stace Williams, Paul Thorson and the Stace Williams Law Firm, P.C., (APPELLEES/CROSS-APPELLANTS) Mario Castillo, (CROSS-APPELLEE)

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: February 9, 2005
• Docket: 04-04-00223-CV
• Status: Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-04-00223-CV

Rosemaria REYES DE NAVA and Sergio Nada Hernandez,

Parents of Deceased and as the Representatives of

the Estate of Mauricio Rigoberto Nava, et al.,

Appellants/Cross-Appellees

v.

FLASH TRUCKING, INC., Dora A. Alanis, and

Fernando Coronado Barbosa (Appellees/Cross-Appellants); Stace Williams, Paul Thorson,

and The Stace Williams Law Firm, P.C. (Appellees/Cross-Appellants); and

Mario Castillo (Cross-Appellee)

From the 111th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 1999-CVE-000985-D2

Honorable Raul Vasquez, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting:            Alma L. López, Chief Justice

Catherine Stone, Justice

Sarah B. Duncan, Justice

Delivered and Filed:   February 9, 2005

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

            Appellants’ brief, which was due on December 13, 2004, has not been filed. On January 5, 2005, this court ordered appellants to show cause in writing by January 20, 2005, why the appellants’ portion of this appeal should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. Appellants did not respond. The appellants’ portion of the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). The dismissal does not affect the status of the cross-appeal. Costs of appeal will be taxed upon the final disposition of the appeal.