Roselle v. City of East Orange
181 A.2d 751, 37 N.J. 462
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons-given by the trial court in an opinion reported under the name of Greggio v. Orange, 69 N. J. Super. 453 (1961).
For affirmance—Chief Justice Weintraub, and Justices Jacobs, Francis, Proctor, Hall and Haneman—6.
For reversal—Hone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Roselle v. City of East Orange, 181 A.2d 751, 37 N.J. 462 (N.J. 1962).
181 A.2d 751 (Roselle v. City of East Orange) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services
9 A.3d 882 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2010)
Gallagher v. Mayor of Irvington
445 A.2d 477 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1982)
Muccio v. Cronin
343 A.2d 158 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1975)
Battaglia v. Wayne Township Planning Board
236 A.2d 608 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1967)