Roselle Park Trust Co. v. Loiseaux

168 A. 408, 114 N.J. Eq. 257, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 903
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedSeptember 27, 1933
StatusPublished

This text of 168 A. 408 (Roselle Park Trust Co. v. Loiseaux) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roselle Park Trust Co. v. Loiseaux, 168 A. 408, 114 N.J. Eq. 257, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 903 (N.J. 1933).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Buchanan delivered in the court of chancery.

*261 For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Yan Bus-kirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
168 A. 408, 114 N.J. Eq. 257, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 903, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roselle-park-trust-co-v-loiseaux-nj-1933.