Rosell v. Borough of Avon-By-the-Sea

70 N.J.L. 336, 41 Vroom 336, 1904 N.J. LEXIS 125
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedFebruary 29, 1904
StatusPublished

This text of 70 N.J.L. 336 (Rosell v. Borough of Avon-By-the-Sea) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rosell v. Borough of Avon-By-the-Sea, 70 N.J.L. 336, 41 Vroom 336, 1904 N.J. LEXIS 125 (N.J. 1904).

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons set out in the opinion of Mr. Justice Dixon in that court, reported in 39 Vroom 498.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chibe Justice, Garrison, Port, Swayze, Vredenburgii, Vroom, Green, Gray. 9. For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
70 N.J.L. 336, 41 Vroom 336, 1904 N.J. LEXIS 125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosell-v-borough-of-avon-by-the-sea-nj-1904.