Rosel v. Ellison

647 N.E.2d 110, 84 N.Y.2d 976, 622 N.Y.S.2d 905, 1994 N.Y. LEXIS 4436
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 13, 1994
StatusPublished

This text of 647 N.E.2d 110 (Rosel v. Ellison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rosel v. Ellison, 647 N.E.2d 110, 84 N.Y.2d 976, 622 N.Y.S.2d 905, 1994 N.Y. LEXIS 4436 (N.Y. 1994).

Opinion

On the Court’s own motion, appeal transferred, without costs, to the Appellate Division, Third Department, upon the ground that a direct appeal does not lie when questions other than the constitutional validity of a statutory provision are involved (NY Const, art VI, § 3 [b] [2]; § 5 [b]; CPLR 5601 [b] [2]). Motion for poor person relief and a preference dismissed as academic.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 5601
New York CVP § 5601

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
647 N.E.2d 110, 84 N.Y.2d 976, 622 N.Y.S.2d 905, 1994 N.Y. LEXIS 4436, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosel-v-ellison-ny-1994.