Rosekay Amusement Corp. v. Holmden
243 A.D. 82, 276 N.Y.S. 238, 1934 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5491
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 24, 1934·Published
Opinions
For the reasons stated in Bert Amusement Corp. v. Holmden (243 App. Div. 81), decided herewith, the order should be affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements.
Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, Martin, O’Malley and Untermyer, JJ.; Finch, P. J., dissents and votes for modification.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rosekay Amusement Corp. v. Holmden, 243 A.D. 82, 276 N.Y.S. 238, 1934 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5491 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).
243 A.D. 82 (Rosekay Amusement Corp. v. Holmden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bert Amusement Corp. v. Holmden
243 A.D. 81 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1934)