Rosekay Amusement Corp. v. Holmden

243 A.D. 82, 276 N.Y.S. 238, 1934 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5491

This text of 243 A.D. 82 (Rosekay Amusement Corp. v. Holmden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rosekay Amusement Corp. v. Holmden, 243 A.D. 82, 276 N.Y.S. 238, 1934 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5491 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Opinions

Per Curiam.

For the reasons stated in Bert Amusement Corp. v. Holmden (243 App. Div. 81), decided herewith, the order should be affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements.

Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, Martin, O’Malley and Untermyer, JJ.; Finch, P. J., dissents and votes for modification.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bert Amusement Corp. v. Holmden
243 A.D. 81 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
243 A.D. 82, 276 N.Y.S. 238, 1934 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5491, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosekay-amusement-corp-v-holmden-nyappdiv-1934.