Rosefielde v. Renzulli

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rosefielde v. Renzulli

256 A.D.2d 92, 681 N.Y.S.2d 263, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13243

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 10, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 256 A.D.2d 92 (Rosefielde v. Renzulli) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rosefielde v. Renzulli, 256 A.D.2d 92, 681 N.Y.S.2d 263, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13243 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Lehner, J.), entered October 1, 1997, which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment to the extent of declaring that the subject apartment is not exempt from coverage under the Rent Stabilization Law and otherwise dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

In light of plaintiff’s failure to adduce proof in evidentiary form sufficient to controvert defendant’s showing that the subject apartment is her primary residence, defendant’s motion for summary judgment, inter alia, declaring that the apartment remains subject to the Rent Stabilization Law was properly granted (see, Friends of Animals v Associated Fur Mfrs., 46 NY2d 1065). Concur — Lerner, P. J., Ellerin, Andrias and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Lehner, J.), entered October 1, 1997, which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment to the extent of declaring that the subject apartment is not exempt from coverage under the Rent Stabilization Law and otherwise dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

In light of plaintiff’s failure to adduce proof in evidentiary form sufficient to controvert defendant’s showing that the subject apartment is her primary residence, defendant’s motion for summary judgment, inter alia, declaring that the apartment remains subject to the Rent Stabilization Law was properly granted (see, Friends of Animals v Associated Fur Mfrs., 46 NY2d 1065). Concur — Lerner, P. J., Ellerin, Andrias and Saxe, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

256 A.D.2d 92, 681 N.Y.S.2d 263, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13243, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosefielde-v-renzulli-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack