Roseby v. Budlow

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6937

MR. DOUGLAS M. ROSEBY,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

MR. PAUL E. BUDLOW, et al.,

Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (8:10-cv-00417-AW)

Submitted: April 14, 2011 Decided: May 3, 2011

Before WILKINSON and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Douglas M. Roseby, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Douglas M. Roseby appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint, without

prejudice, as not cognizable under Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S.

477 (1994). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See

Roseby v. Budlow, No. 8:10-cv-00417-AW (D. Md. Mar. 9, 2010).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED