Roseburg Forest Products v. Lambert
913 P.2d 1390, 140 Or. App. 131, 1996 Ore. App. LEXIS 423
Opinion
Employer seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board that awarded claimant a penalty under ORS 656.268(4)(g). Claimant, by letter, has conceded that the Board erred and that our decision in SAIF v. Cline, 135 Or App 155, 897 P2d 1172, rev den 321 Or 560 (1995), justifies reversal of the order. We accept that concession.
Reversed and remanded for reconsideration.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Roseburg Forest Products v. Lambert, 913 P.2d 1390, 140 Or. App. 131, 1996 Ore. App. LEXIS 423 (Or. Ct. App. 1996).
913 P.2d 1390 (Roseburg Forest Products v. Lambert) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
SAIF Corp. v. Cline
897 P.2d 1172 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1995)