Home/Court of Appeals of Oregon/Roseburg Forest Products v. Lambert

Roseburg Forest Products v. Lambert

913 P.2d 1390, 140 Or. App. 131, 1996 Ore. App. LEXIS 423
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedMarch 27, 1996
DocketWCB 94-00599, 94-03943; CA A86570
StatusPublished

This text of 913 P.2d 1390 (Roseburg Forest Products v. Lambert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roseburg Forest Products v. Lambert, 913 P.2d 1390, 140 Or. App. 131, 1996 Ore. App. LEXIS 423 (Or. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Employer seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board that awarded claimant a penalty under ORS 656.268(4)(g). Claimant, by letter, has conceded that the Board erred and that our decision in SAIF v. Cline, 135 Or App 155, 897 P2d 1172, rev den 321 Or 560 (1995), justifies reversal of the order. We accept that concession.

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

SAIF Corp. v. Cline
897 P.2d 1172 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
913 P.2d 1390, 140 Or. App. 131, 1996 Ore. App. LEXIS 423, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roseburg-forest-products-v-lambert-orctapp-1996.