Rosebreit Realty Corp. v. Macceber Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rosebreit Realty Corp. v. Macceber Corp.

229 A.D. 791

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 15, 1930

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 229 A.D. 791 (Rosebreit Realty Corp. v. Macceber Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rosebreit Realty Corp. v. Macceber Corp., 229 A.D. 791 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

Order reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, to the extent of striking out, as sham and frivolous, the denials in the 1st paragraph of the answer except as to the denials of the allegations contained in the 11th and 13th paragraphs of the complaint. The counterclaim is dismissed, with the privilege, however, to the respondent to serve an amended answer containing a counterclaim properly alleged, if it be so advised, within ten days after the entry of an order herein. The defendant may not plead a rescission of the contract and in the same alleged cause of action affirm the contract and sue for damages. (Weigel v. Cook, 237 N. Y. 136; Merry Realty Co. v. Shamokin & Hollis R. E. Co., 230 id. 316; Clark v. Kirby, 204 App. Div. 447.) Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Kapper, Hagarty and Scudder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, to the extent of striking out, as sham and frivolous, the denials in the 1st paragraph of the answer except as to the denials of the allegations contained in the 11th and 13th paragraphs of the complaint. The counterclaim is dismissed, with the privilege, however, to the respondent to serve an amended answer containing a counterclaim properly alleged, if it be so advised, within ten days after the entry of an order herein. The defendant may not plead a rescission of the contract and in the same alleged cause of action affirm the contract and sue for damages. (Weigel v. Cook, 237 N. Y. 136; Merry Realty Co. v. Shamokin & Hollis R. E. Co., 230 id. 316; Clark v. Kirby, 204 App. Div. 447.) Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Kapper, Hagarty and Scudder, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

229 A.D. 791, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosebreit-realty-corp-v-macceber-corp-nyappdiv-1930.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack