Roseboro v. Osho

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 31, 2005
Docket05-6059
StatusUnpublished

This text of Roseboro v. Osho (Roseboro v. Osho) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roseboro v. Osho, (4th Cir. 2005).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6059

TERRY LEE ROSEBORO,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

LUCKY T. OSHO,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Graham C. Mullen, Chief District Judge. (CA-04-178-5)

Submitted: March 24, 2005 Decided: March 31, 2005

Before WIDENER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Terry Lee Roseboro, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Terry Lee Roseboro appeals the district court’s orders

dismissing his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown

Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), for

failure to state a claim, see 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) (2000), and

denying his subsequent motion for reconsideration. We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. See Roseboro v. Osho, No. CA-04-178-5

(W.D.N.C. Nov. 29, 2004 & Dec. 20, 2004). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Roseboro v. Osho, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roseboro-v-osho-ca4-2005.