Roseboro v. Comporium Communications

Fourth Circuit

Roseboro v. Comporium Communications

552 F. App'x 259

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 27, 2014

DocketNo. 13-2136

StatusPublished

This text of 552 F. App'x 259 (Roseboro v. Comporium Communications) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Roseboro v. Comporium Communications, 552 F. App'x 259 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Alice L. Roseboro appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and denying relief in her employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Roseboro v. Comporium Commc’ns, No. [260]*2600:10-cv-03267-MBS, 2018 WL 4647519 (D.S.C. Aug. 29, 2018). Roseboro’s motion to amend is granted. We grant dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Alice L. Roseboro appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and denying relief in her employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Roseboro v. Comporium Commc’ns, No. [260]*2600:10-cv-03267-MBS, 2018 WL 4647519 (D.S.C. Aug. 29, 2018). Roseboro’s motion to amend is granted. We grant dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

552 F. App'x 259, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roseboro-v-comporium-communications-ca4-2014.