Roseberry's Estate

176 A. 216, 317 Pa. 45, 1935 Pa. LEXIS 392
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 26, 1934·No. Appeal, 77·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The sole question raised by this appeal is whether the Act of June 26, 1931, P. L. 1384, (amending section 9 of the Orphans’ Court Act of 1917, P. L. 363) repeals the Act of 1828, P. L. 453, in so far as it relates to trusts inter vivos, and vests in the orphans’ courts exclusive jurisdiction of the appointment of substituted trustees in such cases. If there was any doubt as to this matter, it has *46 been resolved by onr decision in tbe case of Schwartz v. Schwartz, 316 Pa. 318, in which we adopted in toto the opinion of the lower court which expressly stated that the jurisdiction over trusts inter vivos conferred upon the orphans’ courts by the Act of 1931, supra, is concurrent with that of the courts of common pleas.

The decree is affirmed at appellant’s costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roseberry's Estate, 176 A. 216, 317 Pa. 45, 1935 Pa. LEXIS 392 (Pa. 1934).

176 A. 216 (Roseberry's Estate) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anderton v. Patterson
69 A.2d 87 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1949)
Webb v. Webb
66 Pa. D. & C. 390 (Westmoreland County Court of Common Pleas, 1948)
Simun Estate
33 A.2d 64 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1943)
Wilson v. Board of Directors of City Trusts
188 A. 588 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1936)
Padelford v. Real Estate-Land Title & Trust Co.
183 A. 442 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1935)