Roseberry v. Brown

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Roseberry v. Brown

140 So. 2d 668, 1962 La. App. LEXIS 1871

Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided April 4, 1962·No. No. 9703·Published

Opinion

AYRES, Judge.

Plaintiff instituted this action to recover judgment for the value of an automobile allegedly demolished in a motor vehicle collision. From a judgment rejecting plaintiff’s demands he has appealed.

This is a companion case to that of Elton L. Wise v. Agricultural Insurance Company, of this court 140 So.2d 662, with which it was consolidated for the purpose of trial. The causes of action in the two cases, as to the question of liability, are identical. This issue was resolved in the aforesaid case adversely to plaintiff.

For the reasons assigned in the companion case, the judgment appealed from is affirmed at plaintiff-appellant’s cost.

Affirmed.

Rehearing denied; GLADNEY, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

AYRES, Judge.

Plaintiff instituted this action to recover judgment for the value of an automobile allegedly demolished in a motor vehicle collision. From a judgment rejecting plaintiff’s demands he has appealed.

This is a companion case to that of Elton L. Wise v. Agricultural Insurance Company, of this court 140 So.2d 662, with which it was consolidated for the purpose of trial. The causes of action in the two cases, as to the question of liability, are identical. This issue was resolved in the aforesaid case adversely to plaintiff.

For the reasons assigned in the companion case, the judgment appealed from is affirmed at plaintiff-appellant’s cost.

Affirmed.

Rehearing denied; GLADNEY, J., dissents.

Roseberry v. Brown, 140 So. 2d 668, 1962 La. App. LEXIS 1871 (La. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

140 So. 2d 668 (Roseberry v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related