Rose v. Yorklyn Construction Co.
This text of 241 A.D. 630 (Rose v. Yorklyn Construction Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to appellants to abide the event, upon the ground that plaintiffs made out a cause of action. (Hyland v. Cobb, 252 N. Y. 325; Dickson v. McCoy, 39 id. 400; Buchanan v. Stout, 139 App. Div. 204; Quilty v. Battie, 135 N. Y. 201; Brice v. Bauer, 108 id. 428; Keenan v. Gutta Percha Manfg. Co., 46 Hun, 544; Hahnke v. Friederich, 140 N. Y. 224; Holzer v. Rosenberg, 209 App. Div. 823.) Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
241 A.D. 630, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rose-v-yorklyn-construction-co-nyappdiv-1934.