Rose v. Watson

54 Miss. 673
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1877
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 54 Miss. 673 (Rose v. Watson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rose v. Watson, 54 Miss. 673 (Mich. 1877).

Opinion

Chalmees, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

If the defendant had in the Circuit Court asked leave in time to put in an affidavit denying the correctness of the account sued on, it would have been proper to have allowed it, though none had been filed in the Justice’s Court. But no such leave was asked until after the parties had gone to the jury, and the plaintiff, having read his account and the affidavit of its correctness-, closed his case. There was no error in the refusal of the court to then allow the' defendant to put in a counter affidavit. The plaintiff had already entitled himself to verdict and judgment. Code 1871, § 782 ; Bower v. Henshaw, 53 Miss. 345; Reinhardt v. Carter, 49 Miss. 315.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McClain v. Henson
153 So. 791 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
54 Miss. 673, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rose-v-watson-miss-1877.