Rose v. Tuemler

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Rose v. Tuemler

37 So. 2d 862, 1948 La. App. LEXIS 644

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedDecember 13, 1948

DocketNo. 18601.

StatusPublished

This text of 37 So. 2d 862 (Rose v. Tuemler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rose v. Tuemler, 37 So. 2d 862, 1948 La. App. LEXIS 644 (La. Ct. App. 1948).

Pincite

Opinion

This appeal was taken by Mrs. Imogene Wilson Rose, who was a guest in the McGehee automobile, from the judgment of the trial court rejecting her demands for damages resulting from personal injuries.

The matter was consolidated for trial with the case of Mr. and Mrs. Sam H. McGehee against these same defendants, in which case an opinion and decree was handed down by us this day affirming the judgment dismissing the McGehee suit.37 So.2d 860.

For the reasons therein stated, the judgment appealed from by Mrs. Rose will likewise be affirmed.

Affirmed. *Page 863

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This appeal was taken by Mrs. Imogene Wilson Rose, who was a guest in the McGehee automobile, from the judgment of the trial court rejecting her demands for damages resulting from personal injuries.

The matter was consolidated for trial with the case of Mr. and Mrs. Sam H. McGehee against these same defendants, in which case an opinion and decree was handed down by us this day affirming the judgment dismissing the McGehee suit.37 So.2d 860.

For the reasons therein stated, the judgment appealed from by Mrs. Rose will likewise be affirmed.

Affirmed. *Page 863

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

37 So. 2d 862, 1948 La. App. LEXIS 644, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rose-v-tuemler-lactapp-1948.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack