Rose v. The State of New York

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK wee eK DARRELL ROSE, Plaintiff, -against- 21 CIVIL 3164 (AT)(OTW) JUDGMENT THE CITY OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION; DEPUTY GUITY; CAPTAIN CHACARA; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER #17482; R. KSETKA, Defendants. wenn K It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated September 26, 2022, having received no objections to the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable Ona T. Wang, the Court reviewed the R&R for clear error and found none. Oquendo v. Colvin, No. 12 Civ. 4527, 2014 WL 4160222, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 19, 2014). The Court has ADOPTED the R&R in its entirety. Accordingly, Defendants’ motion to dismiss is GRANTED and the case is DISMISSED with prejudice. Dated: New York, New York September 27, 2022

RUBY J. KRAJICK

Clerk of Court BY: K Mage Deputy Clerk