Rose v. Stowell
2 Rec. Co. Ct. 982
This text of 2 Rec. Co. Ct. 982 (Rose v. Stowell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York County Court, Suffolk County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rose v. Stowell, 2 Rec. Co. Ct. 982 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1678).
Opinion
Roger Rose plaint. conta Samuel Stowell Defendt According to Attachmt upon bond datd 6th Febr 1671. And the Defendt produceing his Summons by which hee was warned to Answer for hot paying according to bond datd 6° Febr 1678. The plaint. was nonsutd in failure of Summons.
[ See case of same title, above, p. 932.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
2 Rec. Co. Ct. 982, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rose-v-stowell-nysuffolkctyct-1678.